It is estimated it will cost £117 bn and take more than 100 years to deal with the UK’s legacy of radioactively contaminated waste materials from our nuclear past. This waste includes 2.5 million tons of cementitious materials from power stations: decontamination of this waste greatly reduces its volume and reduces disposal costs enormously and understanding the chemical speciation of radionuclides in the waste is key to optimising decontamination now, and planning for new facilities in the future. During decontamination, knowing the exact nature and form of the radioactive species and how such species adhere to contaminated materials is very important as it allows targeted methods to be developed.
The Microfocus Spectroscopy beamline (I18) at Diamond Light Source was chosen because it can provide information on the chemical form of a large range of elements found in nuclear waste, including strontium and caesium, on the scale of a few microns. Within this research I18 was used to reveal how contaminant strontium released from spent nuclear fuel during residence in a cooling pond, reacts with the coating on the pond walls. By investigating this reaction the chemical speciation of the strontium is identified and the decontamination pathways required in nuclear decommissioning are determined. It was found that strontium in water-filled ponds containing used nuclear fuel rods reacts with the titanium dioxide paint brightener in the paint on the pond walls.
The UK’s fleet of first generation ageing nuclear power stations are currently being decommissioned, producing large amounts of radioactive waste that will ultimately be disposed of in the UK’s deep geological disposal facility (GDF). Waste minimisation, to limit the volume of radioactive waste, is essential to maximise disposal capacity and reduce costs1. This is achieved by effective decontamination and/or segregation of materials to isolate the radioactively contaminated fraction. Identification of the radioactive species in potential waste is essential to inform decontamination pathways. Storage ponds for highly radioactive spent fuel are constructed from concrete with a waterproof coating lining the inner walls and the dominant radioactive isotopes derived from the spent fuel in the ponds are 137Cs and 90Sr. Here a unique, moderately radioactive sample of concrete and its coating, drilled from the wall of a spent fuel pond at the Hunterston A Magnox nuclear power station, Ayrshire, Scotland was examined.
Figure 1: Left: ESEM backscattered electron image showing a section through the Hunterston spent fuel pond wall coating, to the underlying concrete. Layers A and B are paint, layer C, an
undercoat, layer D paint and layer E, chlorinated rubber seals with layer F the underlying concrete. Right: Synchrotron XRF chemical maps collected at I18 corresponding to the layers shown in the
A cross section of the core was examined optically and using Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM). This revealed (Fig. 1) a complex structure with layers of paint and undercoat, and chlorinated rubber overlying the concrete building fabric. The concrete comprised fragments of mafic igneous rock (gabbro) in a matrix of sand-based cement composed of portlandite (Ca(OH)2) and amorphous calcium silicate hydrate (CSH). Chemical mapping at Diamond’s Microfocus Spectroscopy Beamline (I18) using X-ray fluorescence mapping (microXRF) showed zones with various chemical signatures and particularly high concentrations of titanium in the paint layers, derived from the commonly used TiO2 pigment in paints (Fig.1).
For synchrotron analysis, an area identified as relatively high in radioactivity using autoradiography at The University of Manchester was targeted. At I18, a bespoke, triply contained support structure and rotating stage was used to undertake detailed analysis (Fig. 2). Initially, the distribution of strontium and titanium across the painted face of the core was determined using microXRF. At the X-ray energy (17 keV) used in the mapping, the majority of the signal for these elements came from the top 1-1.5 mm of the core, with the contribution to the signal decreasing with depth. This revealed several points of high Sr concentration and a background of a lower Sr signal. The titanium was also located in concentrated points and, critically, these correlated positively with the high Sr points (Fig. 3).
Using the XRF map as a guide, the second stage of the synchrotron experiment determined the chemical nature of the Sr and Ti species present. This was achieved using microfocus X-ray absorption spectroscopy (microXAS) at a resolution of 9 µm2. Ti K-edge X-ray Absorption of Near Edge Structure (XANES) confirmed the Ti was present as the mineral rutile form of TiO2, a white pigment used in paints. Extended X-ray Absorption of Fine Structure (EXAFS) data were collected at the Sr K-edge for the full range of Sr signals derived from XRF mapping. EXAFS revealed the Sr in the high concentration points has Sr-O bonding distances (2.58Å) similar to that found in Sr sorbed to rutile (TiO2), although the number of oxygen atoms coordinated to the Sr was larger (5-8) than expected. Crucially, fitting the EXAFS spectra was greatly improved by adding a shell of Ti atoms at 3.54 Å and Sr-Sr interactions at 3.72Å. These data reveal that the highest concentration of Sr on the pond walls was sorbed to the TiO2 pigment at the paint surface, as a hydrated Sr species of variable coordination; these data are consistent with standards analysed in this work and previous studies2. EXAFS and XANES analysis of the low Sr signals observed in the XRF maps revealed these signals came from the cement in the concrete, derived from the low concentrations of Sr found in limestone.
Although the pond coating was intact in the sample, experiments were conducted to determine the fate of Sr and Cs on reaction with the Hunterston concrete, to explore the consequences if a breach occurred. Tracking the fate of the Cs on the painted surface was difficult as the Cs X-ray signals overlaps with the high Ti X-ray signal from the paint pigment. However, there was no Ti in the concrete and using non-active Cs and Sr, the fate of these elements was determined in sorption experiments combining ESEM/EDAX, microXRF and microXAS. Strontium was sorbed as a hydrated species to the (Ca(OH)2) and (CSH) components of the concrete, consistent with previous studies3,4. By contrast, the Cs was found in significant concentrations sorbed onto the mafic igneous rock clasts in the concrete and specifically was co-located with the minerals olivine and pyroxene. Further investigation revealed the Cs was sorbed to clay-like breakdown products of these mafic minerals.
The study reveals the importance of the reactions between the most common paint pigment (TiO2) and strontium, which is highly significant because 90Sr is a key fission product resulting from nuclear power generation and a focus of spent fuel pond decontamination. The work also demonstrates how synchrotron radiation techniques can inform the optimal management of radioactive wastes from our nuclear legacy, and provides insights in radionuclide interactions with cement and clay minerals which will be major components of the multi-barrier GDF designs for disposal of radioactive waste5.
The authors acknowledge the NNL Legacy Waste Decommissioning and Disposal Signature Research Programme, Magnox Ltd, NERC BIGRAD (NE/ H007768/1) and WB and RP acknowledge the support of NERC DTP NE/ K500859/1. Diamond Light Source Ltd and STFC provided synchrotron access under allocation SP9045.
Professor Richard Pattrick, University of Manchester, richard.pattrick (at) manchester.ac.uk
Bower WR, Morris K, Mosselmans JFW, Thompson OR, Banford AW, Law K, Pattrick RAD.Characterising legacy spent nuclear fuel pond materials using microfocus X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 317, 97-107. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.037 (2016).
Nuclear decommissioning; Spent fuel pond; Concrete; Paint; strontium, TiO2; Microfocus X-ray absorption spectroscopy
Diamond Light Source is the UK's national synchrotron science facility, located at the Harwell Science and Innovation Campus in Oxfordshire.
Copyright © 2020 Diamond Light Source
Diamond Light Source Ltd
Harwell Science & Innovation Campus
Diamond Light Source® and the Diamond logo are registered trademarks of Diamond Light Source Ltd
Registered in England and Wales at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom. Company number: 4375679. VAT number: 287 461 957. Economic Operators Registration and Identification (EORI) number: GB287461957003.